« Snap Preview Anywhere | Main | Google Tops 2007 BRANDZ Top 100 »

Blogger's Code of Conduct

Receiving spam is one thing, annoying but relatively harmless. Receiving death threats and personal attacks is another thing entirely. Kathy Sierra, a blogger at Creating Passionate Users, has for the last month been receiving abusive comments and death threats on her blog, and even other people's blogs. You can easily delete such comments but the bad feelings these comments create can't as easily be ignored.

Tim O'Rielly has drafted a Blogger's Code of Conduct following Kathy's ordeal, and many of the 330 plus comments on his site are against his idea.

This is what he is proposing:

  1. Take responsibility not just for your own words, but for the comments you allow on your blog.
  2. Label your tolerance level for abusive comments.
  3. Consider eliminating anonymous comments.
  4. Ignore the trolls.
  5. Take the conversation offline, and talk directly, or find an intermediary who can do so.
  6. If you know someone who is behaving badly, tell them so.
  7. Don't say anything online that you wouldn't say in person.

Lots of bloggers already have their own terms of agreement that are similar to this, and to try to enforce it would make commenters even more reluctant to have their say. Tim has created badges to let users know the code of conduct required on the sites they visit: the Sherrif's star for those that enforce it, and a free for all image for those sites where anything goes.

Bloggers Code of Conduct logo

Anything Goes logoI don't plan on signing up for this when it is introduced, and probably won't leave comments on sites where I have to sign an agreement. It's enough that we have authenticated commenting in place, without this extra constraint.


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.bestoday.com.au/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/796

1 Comments

Bernice said:  

Received an email from Experts Exchange last week and one of the writers mentioned this episode:

Several things struck us about the affairs. First, we were amazed at the level of vitriol spewed in the conflicts. The suggested levels of violence, the gutter-level language, the complete disrespect, disdain and even out-and-out hatred for someone else, all hidden behind IP addresses from the comfort of an office or den or kitchen table, was truly a wonder (in the same sense that a horrific car crash is a wonder) to behold. We can only imagine what kind of parents some of these people are.

Second was the level of self-centeredness that is out there. We have become somewhat accustomed to (though not particularly sympathetic to) the notion that "it's all about me", and its prominence in our culture; the concept that it's always someone else's fault, and that one has no responsibility for what happens seems to be an ongoing theme of the daily news. Someone's disagreement with the ideas, writings and apparent prominence of another has made that person a target for their wrath; one can only surmise that there are two possible reasons: either their ideas aren't good enough to compete, or they're jealous as a cheerleader who wasn't asked to the prom about the latter's standing.

This particular incident even got the attention of the news media.


Leave a comment

Verification (needed to reduce spam):

September 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30

Subscribe

Enter your Email


Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz

Google AdSense

The Playground

DreamHost

GeoURL


Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.